COMPANY BRAIN
CONTROL ROUTE / LEGAL

Advice that survives the version change.

Company Brain keeps every AI-assisted legal answer tied to the clause version, playbook position or policy it came from—reviewable by the person accountable for it.

Bring this workflow to a scope call →
BUILT FOR

General counsel, legal operations, contract managers and in-house counsel supporting AI-assisted drafting or review.

STARTING POINT

One consequential answer, not a whole-document migration.

WHAT CHANGES

A source change becomes a visible business decision.

THE DECISION TO GOVERN

Make one answer
defensible.

If a playbook position or liability clause changed six weeks ago, which AI-assisted answers would still be carrying the old position?

01 / WORKFLOWA contract playbook position, liability clause or standard-terms guidance that is repeated across templates, negotiations and AI-assisted drafting support.
02 / SOURCE + OWNERConnect the authoritative material to the person accountable for its use.
03 / CHANGE + REVIEWWhen the material changes, route the affected answer to a named review decision.
04 / RELEASE + RECORDA dated source version, accountable legal owner, review decision, affected-answer list and release state for the selected workflow.
WHERE TO START

Three useful
first routes.

Choose one that already has a real owner, a source of truth and a consequence when the answer goes stale.

01

Playbook positions

A negotiation position or fallback clause changes. Identify the drafting guidance and AI-assisted answers that need review before the next deal uses them.

02

Standard-terms guidance

Connect a clause's approved wording and its accountable legal owner so an AI-assisted answer can be checked against the current position, not a cached one.

03

Escalation thresholds

Publish a controlled answer for when a deal term requires escalation, with an owner, scope and review state instead of institutional memory.

WHAT A BUYER CAN EXAMINE

Not a claim.
A record.

For the selected workflow, Company Brain makes the governing knowledge route visible instead of leaving it implicit in a chat, prompt or person's memory.

01Source and observed clause version↗

02Named legal owner↗

03Review decision and release state↗

04Affected answer or template record↗

WHAT MAKES A GOOD FIRST SCOPE

Bring the
real thing.

A useful first scope is deliberately narrow. It is strong enough to show a complete control route and small enough for the accountable people to actually review.

  1. 01One position-heavy question that recurs across deals
  2. 02A current playbook or clause library
  3. 03A named legal owner accountable for the position
  4. 04A reviewer who can approve publication
Map this to your workflow →
WHAT A PILOT CAN MEASURE

Time from clause change to review↗

Affected drafting answers held before release↗

Owner and reviewer coverage↗

Evidence records exported for a matter↗

TEAM CONTEXT / NOT A CERTIFICATION

Legal teams are increasingly asked to show how AI-assisted drafting guidance stays current with playbook changes, not just whether the underlying model sounds right. Company Brain supports the knowledge-traceability part of that oversight; it does not provide legal advice or replace professional judgment.

CONTROL-LAYER BOUNDARY

Company Brain does not draft contracts, give legal advice or replace a lawyer's judgment. It makes the knowledge route behind a chosen answer visible and reviewable.