COMPANY BRAIN
CONTROL ROUTE / PEOPLE

Keep HR guidance honest about which policy it's quoting.

Company Brain keeps AI-assisted HR answers—leave policy, benefits guidance, people-ops interpretations—tied to the policy version and the owner accountable for it.

Bring this workflow to a scope call →
BUILT FOR

Heads of people, HR business partners, benefits administrators and people-ops leads.

STARTING POINT

One consequential answer, not a whole-document migration.

WHAT CHANGES

A source change becomes a visible business decision.

THE DECISION TO GOVERN

Make one answer
defensible.

If a leave or benefits policy changed this quarter, which AI-assisted HR answers would still be carrying the old terms?

01 / WORKFLOWA leave policy, benefits rule or people-ops interpretation that is referenced repeatedly by an HR assistant, chatbot or internal knowledge base.
02 / SOURCE + OWNERConnect the authoritative material to the person accountable for its use.
03 / CHANGE + REVIEWWhen the material changes, route the affected answer to a named review decision.
04 / RELEASE + RECORDA dated source version, accountable HR owner, review decision, affected-answer list and release state for the selected workflow.
WHERE TO START

Three useful
first routes.

Choose one that already has a real owner, a source of truth and a consequence when the answer goes stale.

01

Leave policy

A leave entitlement changes. Identify the assistant and knowledge-base answers that need review before the next employee question relies on it.

02

Benefits guidance

Connect the current benefits rule to its accountable HR owner so an answer can be checked against the live policy, not last year's handbook.

03

People-ops interpretations

Publish a controlled answer for a recurring HR question, with an owner, scope and review state instead of relying on tribal knowledge.

WHAT A BUYER CAN EXAMINE

Not a claim.
A record.

For the selected workflow, Company Brain makes the governing knowledge route visible instead of leaving it implicit in a chat, prompt or person's memory.

01Policy source and observed version↗

02Named HR owner↗

03Review decision and release state↗

04Affected answer or handbook record↗

WHAT MAKES A GOOD FIRST SCOPE

Bring the
real thing.

A useful first scope is deliberately narrow. It is strong enough to show a complete control route and small enough for the accountable people to actually review.

  1. 01One policy-heavy question employees ask repeatedly
  2. 02A current handbook or policy source
  3. 03A named HR owner accountable for it
  4. 04A reviewer who can approve publication
Map this to your workflow →
WHAT A PILOT CAN MEASURE

Time from policy change to review↗

Affected answers held before release↗

Owner and reviewer coverage↗

Evidence records exported for a policy audit↗

TEAM CONTEXT / NOT A CERTIFICATION

HR teams are increasingly asked to show that AI-assisted answers to leave, benefits and policy questions reflect the current handbook, not a stale PDF. Company Brain supports the knowledge-traceability part of that; it does not itself administer benefits or replace HR judgment on individual cases.

CONTROL-LAYER BOUNDARY

Company Brain does not administer benefits, approve leave or replace an HR professional's judgment on an individual case. It makes the knowledge route behind a chosen answer visible and reviewable.